<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>LITE 98.7 &#187; research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lite987.com/tags/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lite987.com</link>
	<description>The Best Variety Of Yesterday And Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This Just In: The Real Reason Women Talk WAY More Than Men</title>
		<link>http://lite987.com/this-just-in-the-real-reason-women-talk-way-more-than-men/</link>
		<comments>http://lite987.com/this-just-in-the-real-reason-women-talk-way-more-than-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Just For Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This And That]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica-Rome News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lite987.com/?p=175014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve probably heard that women on the average spout out some 20,000 words day (most of the girls I know can EASILY top that)  and us guys roll in nowhere near that at about 7,000 words a day. But is there a biological reason why? You can thank FOXP2 (no that&#8217;s not a TV channel) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You've probably heard that women on the average spout out some 20,000 words day (most of the girls I know can EASILY top that)  and us guys roll in nowhere near that at about 7,000 words a day. But is there a biological reason why? You can thank FOXP2 (no that's not a TV channel) for your gabbiness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lite987.com/this-just-in-the-real-reason-women-talk-way-more-than-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/lite987.com/files/2013/02/caitlinator.jpg" height="427" width="640" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Flickr / caitlinator</media:description>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Finds Women Injured More in Car Crashes Than Men</title>
		<link>http://lite987.com/study-women-injured-car-crashes/</link>
		<comments>http://lite987.com/study-women-injured-car-crashes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shauna Wright</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This And That]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=55914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study finds women are more likely than men to be injured in automobile accidents, and the culprit may be safety features that are not properly proportioned for them. Researchers reviewed crash data from 1998 through 2008 and discovered that female drivers wearing seatbelts were not only hurt more often than men who wore [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.womenshealth.gov/news/headlines/658036.cfm">new study</a> finds women are more likely than men to be injured in automobile accidents, and the culprit may be safety features that are not properly proportioned for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lite987.com/study-women-injured-car-crashes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/lite987.com/files/2011/10/woman-driver.jpg" height="480" width="640" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">benkaffsblog, Flickr</media:description>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Shows TV Can Hinder the Development of Children Under 2</title>
		<link>http://lite987.com/tv-hinders-child-development-under-2/</link>
		<comments>http://lite987.com/tv-hinders-child-development-under-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Landin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=55248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pediatricians and development experts have strongly urged parents, once again, to limit the amount of television their young children watch. The American Academy of Pediatrics released a recommendation to all parents of children under 2 years old Tuesday. It stressed that any time spent in front of a video screen provides no educational benefits for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pediatricians and development experts have strongly urged parents, once again, to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/19/health/19babies.html?_r=2&amp;src=ISMR_HP_LO_MST_FB">limit the amount of television their young children watch</a>.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.aap.org">American Academy of Pediatrics</a> released a <a href="http://www.aap.org/pressroom/mediaunder2.pdf">recommendation to all parents</a> of children under 2 years old Tuesday. It stressed that any time spent in front of a video screen provides no educational benefits for children under age 2 and can even delay development by leaving less time for important interaction and play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lite987.com/tv-hinders-child-development-under-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/lite987.com/files/2011/10/kids-watch-tv-smaller.jpg" height="427" width="640" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Peter Macdiarmid, Getty Images</media:description>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supplements Could Be Linked to Increased Risk of Death in Women</title>
		<link>http://lite987.com/supplements-linked-increased-risk-death-women/</link>
		<comments>http://lite987.com/supplements-linked-increased-risk-death-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shauna Wright</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=53860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vitamins are said to be good for you. According to a new study from the University of Minnesota, however, that may not always be the case. Researchers reviewed the cases of 38,000 women over a 19-year period and found that those who took supplements had about a 2.4 percent increased risk of death over those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vitamins are said to be good for you. According to a <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/vitamins-may-increase-womens-risk-dying-research-finds-212402256.html" >new study</a> from the University of Minnesota, however, that may not always be the case.</p>
<p>Researchers reviewed the cases of 38,000 women over a 19-year period and found that those who took supplements had about a 2.4 percent increased risk of death over those who didn&#8217;t, which could be related to the compounds supplements contain &#8212; compounds that can be toxic in higher amounts and have a detrimental effect on those who use them long-term.</p>
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lite987.com/supplements-linked-increased-risk-death-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/lite987.com/files/2011/10/vitamins.jpg" height="480" width="640" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Justin Sullivan, Getty Images</media:description>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Finds That Being Easily Embarrassed Is a &#039;Sign of Virtue&#039;</title>
		<link>http://lite987.com/study-embarrassed-sign-of-virtue/</link>
		<comments>http://lite987.com/study-embarrassed-sign-of-virtue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Taylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[This And That]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=51617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People who are quick to be moderately embarrassed are more trustworthy, more generous, and more likely to be monogamous, according to a study from the University of California at Berkeley. Researchers videotaped 60 college students telling stories about an embarrassing  moment – for example asking an overweight woman if she is pregnant — and then rated the speakers on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who are quick to be moderately embarrassed are more trustworthy, more generous, and more likely to be monogamous, according to a study from the University of California at Berkeley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lite987.com/study-embarrassed-sign-of-virtue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/lite987.com/files/2011/10/embarrassed.jpg" height="480" width="640" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Matthew Loberg, Flickr</media:description>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 1008/1104 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/lite987.com

Served from: lite987.com @ 2013-06-20 00:01:24 -->